Search

Showing posts with label environment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label environment. Show all posts

A Game Changing, Innovative, Microscale E-waste Recycling Strategy For The Environment And Manufacturing.

A typical recycling process involves the following – waste is collected, sorted, cleaned and processed, then the processed waste is used to manufacture more of the same product, and the cycle is closed when consumers buy these products. The recycling process depends on the fact that these collected waste are made of the same material. That makes it possible to manufacture new products. Yet, that is not the typical case for e-waste.

E-waste, or electronic products that are no longer working, unwanted, or close to the end of their useful lives, are usually made of heterogeneous materials which cannot be readily separated. Therefore, recycling them and putting them back into the cycle does not seem too commercially profitable for the average manufacturer. Yet, these wastes have to be recycled because if they are put back into the environment, which turns out to be usually the case, the toxic materials contained in them can poison our soil, water, air, or wildlife. 

 

To solve this problem some researchers have developed a selective, small-scale microrecycling strategy which can be used to convert old printed electronic parts like circuit boards and monitors into a new type of strong metal coating. These researchers, Veena Sahajwalla and Rumana Hossain, based their research on the copper and silica that are usually the components of electronic devices. They realized that based on the properties of these compounds they could be extracted from e-waste, then combined at high temperatures, even up to 2,732 F, thereby in the process generating silicon carbide nanowires which can then be processed further to create a durable, new hybrid material that is ideal for protecting metal surfaces.

These technique is innovative and a game changer. This could reduce the number of e-waste that end up in landfills and make it profitable for recycling plants to go into recycling larger amounts of e-waste. Imagine, the typical electronic device like a laptop and a TV screen contains lots of potentially valuable substances that could be used to modify the performance of other materials or used to manufacture new reliable materials. That is what this innovation makes possible. Also, the process, which the researchers have called material microsurgery, could be used to recover a large amount of copper annually for use in industries such as electronic devices, industrial, transportation, and consumer products.

Imagine the number of jobs that could be created in the recycling industry if e-waste was taken out of the ecosystem daily. Imagine what benefits it would bring to our environment not to have to dispose of these devices in landfills where they could percolate back to our water cycle or food.

These material microsurgery technique could also be used to create durable, new hybrid materials that could be used to protect metal surfaces. Yes, and it has been tested. During laboratory experiments it was discovered that the hybrid materials when fixed to steel remain firmly entrenched and when the steel is struck with a nanoscale indenter the hybrid layer does not get detached from the steel but remains firm, showing no signs of cracking or chipping. Further, it was seen to increase the hardness of steel by about 125%.

The potential benefits of this small-scale microrecycling strategy is very high. Thanks to the innovation of these two researchers, we could have a cleaner environment free from e-wastes and making sure more electronic products are not disposed of improperly.

I included this innovation in my blog because of its high potential benefit to mankind. I think this is a problem solved and worthy of being acclaimed.

Materials for this post were taken from a press release by the American Chemical Society, ACS.

How much does MethyMercury (MeHg) pollution cost in EuroZone? Ten billion euros!

No matter how poisonous it is to the brain, especially to infants, children and fetuses, mercury pollution seems unavoidable, especially if you live in a developing country where regulation and alternatives seem nonexistent or very expensive. Name it – either from plants manufacturing chlorine bleach, detergents or shoes, or firms where Polylvinyl Chloride (a.k.a PVC) is part of the production process, then mercury pollution is part of the problems we have to bear.

Advert
Remote print
According to the environmental protection agency (EPA), the waste that is left for many days in your kitchen, medical waste and incinerators that are used to burn these wastes also emit mercury into the atmosphere. In countries with coal mining industries, mercury is emitted into the atmosphere through coal-fired plants, or cement industries that fire kilns run by coal. The worst culprit, tralala!, is gold mining. Thousands of pounds of mercury are released when that wonderful metal is heated for separation and not only into the air, directly into underground water.

Pollution does not only contaminate the waters, air and land, it also makes us sick and sometimes, the costs in ill-health and lost working days run into the billions. So, is it with mercury pollution.

Mercury pollution works by bioaccumulation and bioconcentration.

If ecosystems and food chains were as simple as an artists imagination, there would be less problems from pollution and human negative impacts. Flickr.com/rubyblossom
Unlike greenhouses gases like carbon dioxide which directly pollutes your lungs and gives you cancer and ill-health, mercury pollution works indirectly. Mercury pollution works by bioaccumulation and bioconcentration.

Bioaccumulation is the process of taking in a pollutant such as mercury and then storing them in the body . After mercury is released into the air and water through the sources which I outlined above, the eventual media for mercury reaction to take place is water. Whether in soils containing water or in bodies of water, there are some organisms that methylate mercury or add methyl compound to mercury, thereby transforming it to methylmercury (MeHg). Methylmercury, not mercury on its own, is the devil to be afraid of. MeHg is a neurotoxin, damages the brain and impairs neuromotor development. Methylmercury accumulates in tiny plants and animals which are the start of the food chain. By a series, whether short or lengthy, of consumption patterns, MeHg accumulates in the food chain and into our meals.

First, tiny plants (or phytoplanktons) and animals (or zooplanktons) take up MeHg. These are then eaten up by other animals, accumulating it. Eventually big fishes and animals like Tilapia eat these other fishes and also accumulate MeHg. Finally, you and I take up these poisons into our system when we catch and make these big fishes part of our meals. The higher the organism is in the food chain, or the bigger the size of the organism, the higher the amount of MeHg poison you will find in it. This means that by eating big fishes like Tilapia contaminated with methylMercury, you stand a high chance of having it in your system. This process is called bioconcentration, the higher an organism is in the food chain, the higher its concentration of methylmercury.

The cost is extremely high

MeHg pollution attacks the nervous system, whether in adults or children, although children, fetuses and infants are more vulnerable. It damages the nervous system. It can stop your nerves from working well; can affect the workings of your memory such that you can no longer keep attention when needed; it can affect how your limbs work, and furthermore, it can affect how your eyes calculates space such that you could mistakenly fall down from a story building without realizing it. In health and human terms, the cost is enormous.

A team of researchers wanted to find out the effect of MeHg poisoning in 17 European countries by collecting hair samples from mothers and their children. They found that 1.8 million children are born exposed to toxic levels of MeHg, and of these, about 13% (i.e 232,000) are exposed to hazardous levels. By country analyses showed that children born in Portugal and Spain were most exposed, while Hungarian children were the least.

A member of the research team, Prof. Philippe Grandjean, explained that converting the effects of MeHg on developing brains into IQ points would mean that controlling MeHg pollution equates to 700,000 IQ points per year that would be salvaged; translated into monetary benefits, these is equal to between 8 billion to 9 billion euros per year for the whole of the European Union . Controlling exposure levels in European countries is certainly worth the effort.

The task of controlling MeHg is everyone’s responsibility.

Although MeHg seems unavoidable, the task of controlling it is everyone’s responsibility. Reducing exposure to safety limits should be the goal of every country. Many corporations are going green these days. You can encourage your local power supplier to do the same. When buying items like shoes, bags, and detergents, ask about the manufacturing process. Read the labels. Make sure PVC was not used in the production process. Ask experts in your local community about this if you are in doubt. Keep yourself informed concerning health, safety and environmental issues.

Doing the above, as well as other safety measures, will go a long way in either ensuring you are free from MeHg poisoning, or you chose a lifestyle that will ensure your exposure to MeHg is below the safe limit of 0.58µg/g recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO).



As of writing this article, a yahoo online news article reports that [u.n clinches global deal on cutting mercury emissions more than 140 countries have agreed on the first global treaty to cut mercury pollution through a blacklist of household items and new controls on power plants and small-scale mines, the United Nations said on Saturday, January 19.The treaty will take between three to five years to come into effect. This is welcome news for world health. I pray the UN does achieve its goals.


Advert
Save up to 70% for moms, babies and kids

Monitoring bee populations for food sustainability before decline and death.

It is no news that man is faced with a food crisis, especially in developing countries and Africa due to the effects of climate change. Millions go hungry and starve in countries like Sudan and Ethiopia because they do not have enough to eat. Why should it be news that a class of animals, the humble bees, are facing serious decline worldwide?

Bees. Valuable factors in food production. Credit:Alliect 27/Flickr.com
Bees, like bats, are pollinators. That means, they carry pollen from one crop to the other, thereby fertilizing plants. Plant fertilization is a factor for food production. So, the picture is that when bee population is on steep decline, plant fertilization will seriously drop and crop production will also decline. Eventually, if the matter is not tackled on time, we could be awaiting a food catastrophe the like that would drastically change world food sources and supply, and including who gets to eat and who goes hungry. Crops the bees pollinate are also needed as inputs in other industries like the clothing industry.

The mystery of the decline is solved.

The problem is manifold. First, bees are in serious decline. This situation has been referred to as “colony collapse disorder.” Male adult bees are rapidly dying off or deserting their queen, thereby weakening the chances of the survival of the colony. In addition to that, human manipulation has put the lives of these bees at risk. Pesticides have been found in wax samples, some like neonicotinoids, have been identified as posing a danger to the bees and their ability to carry out pollination. Furthermore, habitat destruction and fragmentation as a result of land development and the spread of monoculture agriculture makes the diverse natural food supply that pollinators need scarcer and more expensive. The planting of genetically modified organism (GMO) crops may also be responsible for poisoning bees and weakening their immune systems when these crops contain toxic insecticides within their genetic structure. A Nigerian agriculturist, Mr. Victor Obi, made a note that bee life cycles are being upset. How does this translate to your income and food supplies? In euro terms, about 153 billion euros would be lost worldwide if bees cannot carry out their pollination activities.

Advert
205747_ $25 off orders of $100 or more
When it comes to building your business, make sure you have all the right tools.
This represents, at 2005 estimates, 9.5% of the value of world agricultural production that humans use as food. Food that are highly at risk are fruits, vegetables, nuts, coffee and cocoa. The loss to you as a consumer, that is, what we all stand to lose if nothing is done to stem this rapid bee decline will, in euro terms, amount to between 190 and 310 billion euros in 2005 terms . Not only are widespread global agricultural catastrophe being awaited, but it would overturn and be a huge economic shock to so many economies in the world.

A laudable project you can partake in.

It is important then that this trend be well reported and monitored. It is as much of serious concern as climate change given the figures involved. That is why a lead organizer of an annual bee population counting program, “Great Sunflower Project”, Professor of Biology Gretchen LeBuhn, in a United Nations-sponsored study, is undertaking bee population counting projects in 200 locations worldwide. These projects are to serve as early warning signals that could help agriculturists and conservationists, understand the problem of declining bee populations. And the cost? Just a meager $2 million dollars. Designed to be simple, repeatable, inexpensive and quick to detect bee population declines, compared with the potential economic losses the world faces, the estimated costs for employing international sample sites scaled to fit regional monitoring needs is little change. You can join the Great Sunflower Project if you think you can help the world understand why bee populations are declining.

Solutions before the end comes

Counting and monitoring bee populations could be one solution to solving the problem. Another is also creating bee-friendly seed mixtures. You know, bees are specialized pollinators. That is, they are choosy about crops they pollinate. These seed mixtures aim to attract bees naturally to plants needing their assistance. Another approach would be for beekeepers to stay abreast of the news related to the industry, especially as it pertains to shipping bees to areas where they are needed for commercial pollination, staying clear of harmful pesticides and herbicides etcetera. The rapid decline in bee population is nature’s way of telling us that environmental conditions are seriously declining. Present human breeding practices and the use of deadly toxins should be rethought. Either we will eventually learn to live with less choices in food supply if this trend is not checked, or millions of persons will not find food reaching them for survival, or both. That is why we have to join the fight against bees decline now. You can show your support by visiting the Great Sunflower Project website now!
Advert
Fast and Free Expedited Shipping on orders over $59 offer applies to Bookbyte inventory only
Fast and Free Expedited Shipping on orders over $59 offer applies to Bookbyte inventory only.


Matched content